On Friday 24 February 2006 10:49, Grobian wrote: > I don't really understand your (over) reaction here. But alas. Er, I just said that we discussed that back with kito iirc, about not adding to the tree more ebuilds until the situation is cleared up.
> I don't think anyone implied that we should do that immediately. I was > just asking for opinions. Not sure how I want to do it in the end. I was just remembering which kind of problems you/we have to cope with ;) > True. Defenitely a better place for it. Problem remains with the > package still on micro level, that it "provides" qt somehow. A (versioned) virtual/qt wouldn't be a bad idea; remains the problem that many things requires to use _X11_ Qt (especially for Qt3), so deps has to be tweaked carefully. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
pgpkyO76KxeaC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
