On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:50:37PM -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
> Yo.
> 
> New one from the looks of it- someone who has time (say, person who 
> commited it), please iron out the portage.dep_opconvert and 
> portage_dep.dep_opconvert.
> 
> Naming sucks at the very least, but they look to be a candidate for 
> refactoring/elimination.

Addendum to this, bug 115983 is a direct result of this- the result is 
|| (a b) , masking of a isn't properly realized.

Might be overkill, but after yet another flip through that code, 
I'm wondering why we haven't gutted that crap.  Thoughts?

Yes, a refactoring will take a bit of time, and will probably 
introduce a bug or two, but the code that's there *really* is pretty 
damn groddy. :)

> ~harring


Attachment: pgpqpWS73dEUF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to