On Tuesday 24 January 2006 23:52, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:08:00 -0800 > Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, if you disagreed with the original response, continue the > > conversation prior to commiting- otherwise we see a commit, then a > > rebuttal a few hours later. Not really how things should go for a > > contested piece of code (at least when the only two to weigh in our > > flat out opposed on it)- especially if the code's effect is > > nontrivial and it hasn't had any actual peer review (only comment was > > on your algo). > > Interesting, you now count for two people? Or who is this second person > you're talking of? I still think you're making more out of this than it > really is. Also there really isn't a point in discussing a difference in > opinion IMO, such attempts lead nowhere. I considered your comment, but > couldn't come up with a reason why a theoretical issue should hold this > up.
Even if Brian can't count, a single (reasonable) voice should be enough to prevent moving forward. That single voice could have said everything that other possible responders were thinking of saying negating the need for further responses. So what's happening with this? As far as I understand it, there's a high probability of incorrect file generation. Should "vdbkeys" be pulled out of emaint's "modules" var until next release? -- Jason Stubbs -- [email protected] mailing list
