On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:56:06PM -0600, R Hill wrote: > agree here. i would go as far as to maybe print a message to that effect > if the build fails while FEATURES="confcache". EBUILD_DEATH_HOOKS comes to mind :)
> > >Meanwhile, if you're getting failures up the ying yang and it's not > >tracked down, I'd state tabling the feature (or tagging massively > >hideous warnings regarding it) is required. Iirc, solar ran a > >full build with confcache enabled (believe it was 0.3.*), so input > >from him would be useful also for comparison. > > damn, i don't want to hold this up, especially if no one else is having > troubles. i have a couple days off right now so i'll do some poking around > and see what i can come up with. i'll open a bug and assign to you if i > figure anything out. CC flameeyes on it please. If ruby isn't restrict'd already, please poke the maintainers to do so also :) ~harring
pgpiQ3mMjvlu6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
