On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:24:56 +0200 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: > > On Monday 19 March 2007, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > >> To this end it would also be useful if the QA notices were _all_ > >> sent to the elog report; the "Files were installed with user/group > >> portage" one is, but I don't think any of the others are. > > > > add "qa" to your elog classes and any messages that still arent > > sent arent properly using the eqawarn func and should be trivial to > > fix -mike > > Is eqawarn something we can use in eclasses? We have quite a few QA > checks in the java eclasses that could potentially make use of this > function. If it's not part of the public API we can of course just if > it exists and fall back to echo. Well, it only exists in >=portage-2.1.2 IIRC, so it comes down to how compatible you want your eclasses to be. Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
