>>>>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019, Michał Górny wrote: >> The difference is that there is now a QA warning for something that >> is perfectly within the spec. Maybe the extra verboseness would be >> enough, but the eqawarn line should be omitted? It doesn't provide >> any info that isn't already present in the output of patch itself.
> It helps people understand why some patches throw a wall of text while > others don't. WFM, but then omit the "please rebase" at least. (Also, with the filename added, the line tends to be very long. Maybe omit that leading whitespace to at least partially compensate?) Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
