> -----Original Message----- > From: Markus Dittrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 5:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] status of lapack install
[lines deleted] > > The currently stable lapack-atlas and blas-atlas (3.7.11) compile > fine with gcc-4.x. > Should you go with lapack-reference you will need the most > recent lapack-reference-3.1.1 not lapack-reference-3.0-r1. > The reference ebuilds (both lapack and blas) take less time > to compile but provide less optimized routines. Hence, you have > to decide what is more important to you. > > cheers, > Markus Hi I went for lapack-atlas and the required blas-atlas did not compile. It suggested an interactive approach so I did interactive=1 emerge blas-atlas and answered the questions. Finally it died here. Looks like sed is looking for an input file. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Configuration completed successfully. You may want to examine the make include file (Make.xeon_dual) for accuracy before starting the install with the command: make install arch=xeon_dual rm -f ./xconfig sed: no input files !!! ERROR: sci-libs/blas-atlas-3.7.11 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1614: Called dyn_compile ebuild.sh, line 971: Called qa_call 'src_compile' environment, line 3681: Called src_compile blas-atlas-3.7.11.ebuild, line 123: Called reconfigure blas-atlas-3.7.11.ebuild, line 110: Called die ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Any suggestions? Thanks, -- Valmor -- [email protected] mailing list
