-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Dittrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 5:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] status of lapack install
[lines deleted]
The currently stable lapack-atlas and blas-atlas (3.7.11) compile
fine with gcc-4.x.
Should you go with lapack-reference you will need the most
recent lapack-reference-3.1.1 not lapack-reference-3.0-r1.
The reference ebuilds (both lapack and blas) take less time
to compile but provide less optimized routines. Hence, you have
to decide what is more important to you.
cheers,
Markus
Hi I went for lapack-atlas and the required blas-atlas did not compile.
It suggested an interactive approach so I did
interactive=1 emerge blas-atlas
and answered the questions. Finally it died here. Looks like sed is
looking for an input file.
You probably have a newer CPU type on which blas-atlas'
configure routine is chocking. I'd try the most recent versions
in ~ARCH, i.e., blas/lapack-atlas-3.7.24.
Good luck,
Markus
- --
Markus Dittrich (markusle)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Scientific applications
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF/wuxxlRwCwb7k40RAmeeAJ93eO7peTJ6WQT4bLPww8Vyglh/bwCePwNc
DlryZNKaVylExudd+b641os=
=XYM7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
[email protected] mailing list
