> On 10/05/10 - 18:57:56, François Bissey wrote: > > > Hi group! > > > > > > I've got some problems installing sci-mathematics/maxima in both my > > > > Funtoo > > > > > boxes. > > > > > > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/271383/ > > > > > > The issue seems to be similar to : > > > http://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/issue/14, and the > > > work-around to redefining LDFLAGS works as well. However, something > > > > is > > > > > wrong with the way maxima deals with the LDFLAGS. > > > > OK I will have a look, it may be something I overlooked in my > > patches, it used > > to work here, so it may be caused by a slight change somewhere in the > > system > > since then. > > > > If you want maxima for sage you don't have to use the version located > > in the > > science overlay. It was a proof of concept for some patches. The > > version in > > portage will work just as well. > > 5.20.1-r2 > > Francois > > For what it's worth, on my amd64 I'm unable to build the portage > maxima-5.20.1-r2 either with > > LDFLAGS="-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed" > > There is the same > > make[1]: *** [binary-ecl/maxima] Error 1 > > In fact ecls will not even configure with the indicated LDFLAGS. > Deleting "-Wl,--sort-common" allows ecls as well as maxima to be built. > OK I tested both: LDFLAGS="-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed" emerge -1v --nodeps maxima LDFLAGS="-Wl,-01 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed" emerge -1v --nodeps ecls which build respectively maxima-5.20.1-r3 and ecls-10.4.1, on my x86 system and it merged fine. Does it work in your 32bits chroot Steve?
Francois
