On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Thomas Kahle <[email protected]> wrote: >> it is masked. > > ... and that is irrelavant from a dev perspective. People report bugs > and we have to come up with solutions. The mask just makes the problem > less urgent. >
we do not have to come up with solutions for glpk api breaks. i could have simply not bump glpk in the tree and there will be no bugs. masking or subslot dependencies is what we can do without diving into upstream code. obviously patches are welcome.
