On 06/25/2013 12:16 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Quoting Sébastien Fabbro <[email protected]>: > >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Thomas Kahle <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> it is masked. >>> >>> ... and that is irrelavant from a dev perspective. People report bugs >>> and we have to come up with solutions. The mask just makes the problem >>> less urgent. >>> >> >> we do not have to come up with solutions for glpk api breaks. i could >> have simply not bump glpk in the tree and there will be no bugs. >> masking or subslot dependencies is what we can do without diving into >> upstream code. obviously patches are welcome. > > Looking at 4ti2 in particular, that's a substantial amount of code. If you > fix it, that would pretty much get you ownership of it, but I see you > already > have a fork on github with a few commits, Thomas.
I was working on a different part of the code though. > So you are after glpk documentation on how to migrate? I haven't seen > anything > useful on glpk's mailing list but it wouldn't hurt to ask there. Yes, a migration guide would be useful, but then again, I'm not interested in investing too much time into this. Cheers, Thomas -- Thomas Kahle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
