On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:11:59 +1300 François Bissey <frp.bis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/10/16 06:10, v...@ukr.net wrote: > > Hello! > > > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:55:18 +1300 > > François Bissey <frp.bis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> OK so I checked on my other machine. liblinbox.so should have been > >> linked to (c)blas and so should have matrix_modn_dense_float.so > >> independently. Because you didn’t get any complaints from ldd > >> on liblinbox.so I’ll assume that it was missing/not properly > >> detected when linbox was built. The way matrix_modn_dense_float.so > >> is built also suggest that cblas was missing when built. > >> > >> What does > >> pkg-config —libs cblas > >> pkg-config —libs blas > >> pkg-config —libs lapack > >> report? > >> > > $ pkg-config --libs cblas > > -lgsl > > > > $ pkg-config --libs blas > > -lblas > > > > $ pkg-config --libs lapack > > -lreflapack -lblas > > > > Smells like a system using the main tree blas/lapack rather > than the science overlay. I may have to enforce something > there. Anyway those are very strange answers nonetheless. > I would expect "-lgslcblas" not "-lgsl". If you have > "-lreflapack" what blas are you using if not "refblas"? > So does /usr/lib64/libgslcblas.so exist on your system? > Is /usr/lib64/libblas.so a dangling symlink (point to nothing)? > > Francois > > OK, the blas does appear to be perhaps dangling, but the the cblas looks like what was reported at https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/429. Steve
pgpnCkWo4bjo8.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
