On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, David Miller wrote: > My solution: > The solution seems to be CFQ IO scheduling. I had previously used > Deadline and the Anticipatory scheduler but neither of these solved > the problem. CFQ seems to keep everything happy even under a mixed > I/O load of multiple writes (35mb/s or so) and multiple I/O reads > (70mb/s or so). The server load is still high in the 12 to 14 range > but the server and it's services seem to be much more stable.
I had a (dumb?) question: if you enable all the schedulers in a 2.6 kernel, which one is picked as the default? -- -- [email protected] mailing list
