On 8/5/05, A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, David Miller wrote: > > > My solution: > > The solution seems to be CFQ IO scheduling. I had previously used > > Deadline and the Anticipatory scheduler but neither of these solved > > the problem. CFQ seems to keep everything happy even under a mixed > > I/O load of multiple writes (35mb/s or so) and multiple I/O reads > > (70mb/s or so). The server load is still high in the 12 to 14 range > > but the server and it's services seem to be much more stable. > > I had a (dumb?) question: if you enable all the schedulers in a 2.6 > kernel, which one is picked as the default? >
The anticipatory scheduler is the default in 2.6 unless specified otherwise. Cheers, --Kerin Millar -- [email protected] mailing list
