Hi!
Another mail said that the kernel cannot be placed to a RAID5 array,
only to a RAID1 array, so who's right? Or did I got something wrong?
Marton Gabor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<ICQ UIN: 169394884>,<T: +36 30 447-2042>
VE-MIK
VeHoK informatikai megbizott
informatika-l adminisztrator
informatika-lev adminisztrator
bsc-info adminisztrator
gazdinfo adminisztrator
xyon wrote:
(4 X 250GB ) - (1 X 250GB) = 750GB without hotspare. Although having a
hot-spare may be worth it.
You should be able to RAID-5 /boot and all other partitions (minus swap,
of course). As long as the RAID modules are built into the kernel and you
have a functional raid config, you should be good.
On Thu, March 2, 2006 11:19, Marton Gabor wrote:
Hi!
Thank you all for the fast replies, you helped me a lot. Unfortunately
we cannot afford a HW RAID card, so I have to make it with software RAID.
Now I have the idea to use RAID5 and if I get the picure rigth I need
let's say a ~100MB /boot in RAID1, 512MB swap not in RAID on every disk,
and I can build a RAID5 from the rest of the storage space, and will be
able to use 750GB-(/boot*4)-(swap*4) and the 4th HD will store the
so-called parity information.
Marton Gabor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<ICQ UIN: 169394884>,<T: +36 30 447-2042>
VE-MIK
VeHoK informatikai megbizott
informatika-l adminisztrator
informatika-lev adminisztrator
bsc-info adminisztrator
gazdinfo adminisztrator
--
[email protected] mailing list
--
[email protected] mailing list
