Hi

Have been using Win4Lin under SuSE (haven't installed it on my Gentoo machine 
yet) and am very happy. Most un-M$ like - Win98 is fast and stable. If it 
does crash the reboot is fast (about 3 x speed) and one doesn't have to go 
through the filesystem check.

As a doctor I make significant use of Endnote (a reference / bibliography 
management system that has a plug-in to M$ Word) for writing papers. Also 
allows me to use IE for the small but disturbing number of web sites which 
just won't play ball unless you are using Gates-ware. Win4Lin provides me 
with the ideal solution. Note that it won't do DirectX, so modern M$ games 
are a non-starter. There are some issues with the peripherals you can run 
from your Win4Lin session within Linux, even if Linux itself can use the 
peripheral. The essentials like mouse and printer are fine but things like 
scanners are more problematic. Check out the netraverse web site for more 
info, or contact them if you have a particular question - my experience of 
their customer support is very favourable. Finally the Vnet networking 
solution works well - I run samba to allow me to map my home docs directory 
within /home.

I feel that for anyone (like me!) who needs to run a few "legacy" windoze 
applications, Win4Lin is an ideal solution. I have never run VMware, but my 
understanding is that it is rather different - it provides a full virtual PC 
that therefore can run any M$ OS within it (i.e. NT family, not just 
Win95/98/me). As this is a bigger undertaking it is reflected in performance 
and cost. It is a horses-for courses issue - if you are developing software 
to run on M$ OS or have very particular requirements then VMware may be the 
better choice but if you are in my boat, then I don't hesitate to recommend 
Win4Lin.

Hope that helps.

Regards

Johan
-- 
Dr Johan Waktare
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
3 Holders Lane, Moseley, Birmingham, B13 8NL, UK
Home tel / fax +44 (0)121 249 0984
Mobile +44 (0)780 193 1215

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to