On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 22:16:39 -0800 Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> should there not be an entry in saned.conf "usb 0x03f0 0x0901" Nope not from what I can tell. Saned is purely if I'm using my scanner on the network. However I don't want my son messing with my scanner and he's on windows anyways.(tho he wants linux *g* .. not a big enough hd on it for duelboot I'm afraid...) saned.conf from the comments inside it and the man page wants ip's that are ok access to the scanner and I also must have "net" uncommented in the dll.conf. I've emailed hp and asked them if the 2300c is using same chipset as the 2100c/2200c or if it's using the same as the 3500c. If it's using the 3500c's chip(which it could be as my manual also covers that model) that might pose a problem. It uses a realtek chipset which they list on the sane page. However as far as I can tell no backend is up for it. My kernel does see the scanner it's just sane doesn't. :/ But eh at least the kernel see's it now.(weird that the 2.4.21 patch messes up usb) I also unmasked and am using the latest sane-frontends, sane-backends, and xsane. Unfortunately it's just not working. I also went through the dll.conf and stuck comments in as to what type of scanners the drivers cover(ie usb, scsi, paraport, etc). Going through it one by one. Somethings got to work if not I guess I'll wait til newer versions come out and reboot to scan. :P -- Susie VE7 HFA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://arienadean.tripod.com/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "People never grow up, they just learn how to act in public." -Bryan White -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
