Hey thanks a lot for the reply.  I'm currently building 3.2.3 as i write this (gcc is 
huge!).  I've also modified my cflags to be much more aggressive.  When i rebuild 
world, this will most likely break things; do you comply/agree?  Even though i'm now 
using -Os instead of -O3, i've also included some other -fFLAGS.  I'm sure some are 
redundant (as implied by -march=pentium4).

Basically:
CFLAGS="-s -march=pentium4 -O2 -pipe -mfpmath=sse -msse -mmmx -fomit-frame-pointer 
-frerun-cse-after-loop -frerun-loop-opt -fthread-jumps -fforce-addr 
-falign-functions=4"

Not quite sure what is going to happen, but i'm building gcc 3.2.3 with these flags 
right now, and all seems well ;-).  Please feel free to 
comment/flame/threaten-with-death/etc.  Thanks!

Brett

On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 01:07:50AM +0100, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 23:21, Brett Campbell wrote:
> > Hello list,
> > i use a pentium4 chip, and, despite a stable system, have just learned of the 
> > invalid sse2 cruft.  i am in fear for my system's health, regardless of its 
> > excellent performance :).  I have read that gcc 3.2.3 has fixed this stuff, but i 
> > was considering rebuilding the entire system with 3.3 (as the 3.2.3 branch has 
> > ceased/closed).
> > has anyone tried or used 3.3 yet?  what would be implications or undesired side 
> > effects from rebuilding my system?  is there direct confliction with glibc?  i 
> > doubt it.  any suggestions from anyone who has more knowledge than i do would be 
> > well appreciated :-)
> 
> I use a P4 and recently suffered errors in the nature of compilation
> failures.  On rebuilding with P3 cflags using 3.2.2 mysteriously those
> packages which were failing previously emerged perfectly.  Right after
> rebuilding 3.2.3 was moved to testing tree so that's what I'm using
> now.  It works fine and is known to fix P4 bugs.
> 
> Regarding 3.3, having seen bugs.gentoo.org flooded with gcc 3.3 related
> problems not long back I would strongly suggest that you do not go for
> it yet.  It is hardmasked for these reasons.  From what I gather work is
> being done to smoothen the migration and in good time 3.3 will be moved
> to mainstream use.
> 
> The wise move may be to wait for the 3.3 release to stabilise either on
> testing or stable and then rebuild although if you did rebuild with
> 3.2.3 that should be fine too.
> 
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

-- 
''Wisdom is the companion of patience''

       ,-~~-.___.
      / |  '     \
     (  )         0
      \_/-, ,----'
         ====           //
        /  \-'~;    /~~~(O)
       /  __/~|   /       |
     =(  _____| (_________|

Brett Ryan Campbell
Systems Administrator, CAD Research Center
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407
http://www.cadrc.calpoly.edu/frameset_content/content_about_us.html

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to