On Thursday 03 July 2003 20:20, Arnold Krille wrote: > On Thursday 03 July 2003 17:59, Dmitry Suzdalev wrote: > I didn't say kde4 wont use aRts. Its just a maybe.
Sorry, I misunderstood you. > And a new multimediasystem for kde has to support a lot of features like > sound-mixing, video, synchronisation, network-abilities (not just opening > remote files but sending audio/video over network). I didn't want to say that this things are senceless. I understand that some people will find them useful (but I (personally) dont). I just wanted to note that *for now* and *for me* arts sucks. I will be _very_ glad if someday aRts will become a powerfull multimedia system -- then I'll like it and I'll use it... But please, don't get too offencive -- it's just my opinion. After all it's an opensource world -- anyone chooses what he likes best ;). > And if we have a system that fulfills all of this things, there will still > be people saying: "I just want to hear sound. I don't need a full > media-framework." Not recognising that they also need a system mixing two > sounds if the icq-client has a message while they are listening to music... I have such a functionality w/o using arts. I use SBLive/Alsa and it works great for me. > Multimedia isn't that trivial. If you just want to listen to music, get > yourself a radio... I already have one, but it can't react to iconify/deiconify events :). > > Arnold, who likes aRts and actively tries to improve it... I wish you luck! I think, aRts needs a lot of improvements. I beleive in your programming skills, your KRec works very well and I like it! :). Thanks for reply, Arnold. Regards, Dmitry. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
