On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 17:23, Stroller wrote: > On 3/7/03 6:28 pm, "Christopher Egner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Alright then, any ideas what to use. I mean, I agree syncing to multiple > > servers seems a bit drastic (nice to know I won't be late for work, but > > still...). ... > > > > If anyone has any other ideas. let me know > > rdate was mentioned on a posting a couple of months ago. > > HTH, > > Stroller.
I don't understand the objection to ntpd. I run it at home and at work. It works great and uses very few resources. The idea for using at least three servers is reliability. Ntpd keeps track of the servers and uses what it considers the best server to sync to, if that one goes down it will switch to one of the others. Use it and you will never have to worry about drifting time. -- Tim Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
