It'd be "most excellent" if portage used a faster database engine... say
mysql.. to catalog it's data.
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 05:15 pm, daniel wrote:
> On July 29, 2003 04:48 pm, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > The better way would be to rewrite portage with a modular approach, so
> > it can use different backends (the current code is not very friendly for
> > that). But that needs a lot of time.
>
> alright then, i have some (not much, but some time). what languages do i
> need to know? like i said earlier, i'm just a webgeek (perl/php/mysql) but
> i'm willing to dive into python if it means getting a more robust portage.
--
******************************************************************************
Registered Linux User Number 185956
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux
Join me in chat at #linux-users on irc.freenode.net
This email account no longers accepts attachments or messages containing html.
4:42pm up 19 days, 2:40, 4 users, load average: 1.19, 1.46, 1.37
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
