On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:32:59 -0400 daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On July 29, 2003 01:50 pm, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: > > Emerge sync was never really 'quick' as such. A lot of files > > (~50000) files get updated each time including cache during the > > 'hang' that you mention. > > so what're the chances that portage might be switching to a more > robust database-driven setup? >
My $.02. I don't need to sync hourly, so it's no big deal. I'd rather see time spent on making portage more robust. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
