I emailed the developer asking him about this. Well, I asked him why they didn't just use portage and hack the backend plugin code into portage. He said that portage was such a hack job that it would just be easier to do a complete rewrite. I believe he also talked to some of the Gentoo portage developers to see if there was any interest in incorporating this into portage. He said they weren't.

Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
I was reading the site, any ideas when this can be a option in the real portage?? this would be a great feature to have.

It doesn't say on the site if it will every get incorporated in.


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Gaffney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage in SQL


Marshal Newrock wrote:


On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Andrew Gaffney wrote:



Check out <portagesql.breakmygentoo.net>


Ah, I wasn't aware of this. It's probably a bit more

sophisticated than


my simple attempt. It was a good exercise anyway. :)

They have basically rewritten portage from the ground up. It's not exactly as feature rich as the real portage, but most of the basic stuff is there. They have a backend plugin system, so you can use just about any database that you want.


--
Andrew Gaffney


-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list




--
Andrew Gaffney


-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Reply via email to