On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:24:37 -0600 Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:24:04PM -0600, Collins Richey wrote: > > 2) Re both resierfs and xfs, I've seen about equal numbers of responses on > > any number of mailing lists: > > > > "pick-a-fs" ate my lunch, hard drive, and system. > > "pick-a-fs" is the greatest thing since sliced bread. > > > > You pays you money (or time), you takes you chances. > > Pretty wise viewpoint, I'd say. And basically what I was trying to get > across. If you value your data, don't use filesystems that have regular > reports of eating other people's data for lunch. :-) Boring, I know... > but safer. (GRIN) As you reported earlier, 200 machines on ext3 without a glitch sounds like a winning combo to me! -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
