On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:41:19 -0600, "Jeffrey Smelser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responded thusly:
No, you should have read the error.. make.conf is suppose to be there and functional. Its not a documentation error as your trying to convey.. This is a possible bug that needs to be addressed...

Okay, I thought it was. Having read over everyone's responses has led me to believe otherwise. I didn't write down the error I was having. I actually recieved three errors. One about a bad token <"="> and two more that I don't remember.



thats why I asked for the error. I presume you just assumed it was a documentation error and didn't read the error that was happening?

I did read the error that was happening, but I assumed it was because make.conf wasn't there. Stupid me. My apologies.


<snip>
--
The only fallacy is the inaction on our part to stave off the worst of horrors, the stripping of personal freedom.


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Reply via email to