> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:41:19 -0600, "Jeffrey Smelser" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> responded thusly: > >No, you should have read the error.. make.conf is suppose to be > >there and functional. Its not a documentation error as your > trying to > >convey.. This is a possible bug that needs to be addressed... > > Okay, I thought it was. Having read over everyone's responses has led > me to believe otherwise. I didn't write down the error I was > having. I > actually recieved three errors. One about a bad token <"="> and two > more that I don't remember.
Ahh, this is a bad make.conf entry.. Hopefully this has been fixed already and you just got "unlucky" when you downloaded your live cd.. > > > >thats why I asked for the error. I presume you just assumed it was a > >documentation error and didn't read the error that was happening? > > I did read the error that was happening, but I assumed it was because > make.conf wasn't there. Stupid me. My apologies. No apologies... I am just explaining it so we both are on the same wave length and you know for future to write that stuff down so we can trouble shoot this better together.. And in this case, its a bug that should be in the bug list.. Your the first I have heard of this so did you just download your livecd or is it older? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
