On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 13:25, Jonas Widarsson wrote: > Redeeman wrote: > > >due to the last 2 threads about ogg and mp3, i decided to make some > >test, and they shows some extremely interresting things. > > > >i have used the following tools: tar, bz2, lame, oggenc > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/sound_test$ ls -lh > >total 90.4M > >-rw-r--r-- 1 redeeman redeeman 8.3M Dec 8 12:43 > >the_hero-sterio-nominel-320kbps.mp3 > >-rw-r--r-- 1 redeeman redeeman 28M Dec 8 12:26 the_hero.flac > >-rw-r--r-- 1 redeeman redeeman 7.3M Dec 8 12:40 > >the_hero-vbr-j-sterio-320kbps.mp3 > >-rw-r--r-- 1 redeeman redeeman 6.4M Dec 8 12:48 the_hero.tar.bz2 > >-rw-r--r-- 1 redeeman redeeman 37M Dec 8 12:26 the_hero.wav > >-rw-r--r-- 1 redeeman redeeman 3.4M Dec 8 12:44 > >the_hero-sterio-nominel-120kbps.mp3 > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/sound_test$ > > > >i must say i belive tar and bz2 is much more looseless than ogg and mp3, > >and it takes SO little space up, its almost fantastic, look at flac, > >28mb, tar.bz2: 6.4mb. > >this even shows that its better to bz2 them than to compress with > >varible bitrate, joint sterio 320kbps mp3. the compressions time was > >even smaller on the bz2, so i wonder if there is going to be a bz2 > >plugin for xmms soon? > > > > > > > > > Why tar it? > A single file does not need to be tarred. because i always use tar -cjvf, so i just did that here too :) > Jonas > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- Regards, Redeeman () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ - against microsoft attachments
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
