I have been trying to figure this out with google, but the answer is still a little less than clear, so I thought I would bother you good folks.
I have been trying to figure out whether NAT adds any additional functionality that I could not get with comprehensive iptables rules. In other words, if I were to specifically forward those ports that I needed from the firewall to the correct internal machines and then do the same for outgoing traffic, do I have to have to have NAT active on the firewall box? -- Ian Truelsen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: ihtruelsen Homepage: http://www.ihtruelsen.dyndns.org Signature key (742B740D) available at pgp.mit.edu
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
