On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:44:14 +0100 "SN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So to answer your question yes you need NAT unless you have public ips > on those machines inside your network > Thanks. That is what I thought, but the info that I was able to locate seemed to be implying that iptables rules could be used to eliminate the need. Thanks to all for clearing this up for me. -- Ian Truelsen Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: ihtruelsen Homepage: http://www.ihtruelsen.dyndns.org Signature key (742B740D) available at pgp.mit.edu
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
