On Tuesday 10 February 2004 11:42 am, Jani-Matti H�tinen wrote: | Kurt V. Hindenburg kirjoitti (sunnuntai, 8. helmikuuta 2004 23:07): | > It should not have been made stable if there is a chance of | > screwing up the entire portage system such that it will not | > work... | So, in other words no version of portage should ever be marked | stable. Writing a piece of software that doesn't just work
Only for software like sys-apps/portage. If portage is broken, then the entire gentoo/portage is borked. I think it is not asking too much that sys-apps/portage be handled with extra caution when marking it stable. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
