> Did I miss something? Nope, you hit the nail on the head.
> How do I check (command syntax) that the profile is actually updated ? ls -l /etc/make.profile should indicate what profile you're linked to. > How come all of those 'use.defaults' files still > have 2004.x in the path names instead of 2005.0 ? I believe the 2005.x standard is to use the /u/p/p/default-linux/use.defaults; the 2004 version(s) were used by those specific profiles. In fact if you look at the listing it would appear that the intention is that the profile-specific use.defaults are extensions to the d-l/use.defaults file, indicating that at some point along the way it was determined that no 2005.x specific additions are necessary. Obviously there are others more qualified than I to answer this one correctly. -- [email protected] mailing list
