> > If I use -nptlonly instead of +, do I still risk incompatibilities? > > with ntplonly you WILL have problems. With 'nptl', you can say the apps which > implementation to use. Great for broken/old apps with problems. BUT if you > use ntplonly you can NOT go back, and if an app has a problem with nptl, you > are out of luck. So, just remove ntplonly from your make.conf and everything > will be fine. Since nptlonly should not be set by default, removing nptlonly > should be as good as -nptlonly ;)
How do you tell an app to use linuxthreads instead? What is the point of +nptlonly? A more compact installation? - Grant -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
