On Mon, 16 May 2005 17:10:32 -0700 Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/16/05, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If I use -nptlonly instead of +, do I still risk incompatibilities? > > > > > > with ntplonly you WILL have problems. With 'nptl', you can say the apps > > > which > > > implementation to use. Great for broken/old apps with problems. BUT if you > > > use ntplonly you can NOT go back, and if an app has a problem with nptl, > > > you > > > are out of luck. So, just remove ntplonly from your make.conf and > > > everything > > > will be fine. Since nptlonly should not be set by default, removing > > > nptlonly > > > should be as good as -nptlonly ;) <snip> > Well, I'm certainly no example of doing things right but I've been > running nptlonly for quite awhile now and I personally don't know of > any problems caused by running that way. Theer may certainly be apps > that don't like it but maybe I don't run them. I don't know. It works > for me. Earlier, I was going to send the same thought but I, too, am not a shining example of 'linux master'. I am running a ~x86 nptlonly system with no problems that I can attribute to it being a nptlonly system <snip> -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
