Mike, Where do I report problems? I seem to have a pretty disastorious reboot! I am writing from the machine, so X and netowrking are up, but many drivers didn't load and I am seeing many versions of this message in demsg: (replace agpgart with many names...)
agpgart: version magic '2.6.11-gentoo-r6 preempt PENTIUMIII gcc-3.3' should be '2.6.11-gentoo-r6 preempt PENTIUM4 gcc-3.3' I hope someone can point me in the right direction to get this fixed ASAP. Thanks, Mark On 6/1/05, Paul Varner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Forwarded from gentoo-dev at author's request to gentoo-user > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers > Date: 2005-05-25 22:20:02 GMT > > yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we want to get > new baselayout stable asap', we're serious > > so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they notice any > regressions ? the 'best' tests are simply rebooting and seeing if your > system comes up :) > > common gotchas: > - many config options have moved from /etc/rc.conf into /etc/conf.d/ files > - /etc/hostname and /etc/*domainname have been moved into /etc/conf.d/ files > - the net scripts have been completely rewritten thanks to UberLord ... old > config styles should work fine, but it's best if you update > your /etc/conf.d/net syntax ... just review /etc/conf.d/net.example or this > URL: http://dev.gentoo.org/~uberlord/net-book/ > > somethings to note ... > regressions with lvm/lvm2/evms will not be considered ... they have had all > their code forked into the respective packages and thus are no longer part of > baselayout ... bugs with those packages should be taken up with their > respective maintainers > -mike > > -- > [email protected] mailing list > > -- [email protected] mailing list
