On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò <[email protected]> wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 30/09/2010 alle 16.10 +0100, Neil Bothwick ha scritto:
>>
>> > 2.2 series also got the same feature, but I don't remember since
>> which
>> > rc… the latest masked version is definitely fine though.
>>
>> Does that mean I shouldn't have to run lafilefixer as it  run
>> automatically on new installs?
>
> You should still run it once, to make sure that the system is clean, but
> you can forget about it afterwards, and even unmerge it from the system.
>
> The alternative, of course, is to emerge -e world — but I wouldn't
> suggest that just to spend some time ;)
>
> In either case, whether you add the function or leave it to Portage to
> deal with, it should become transparent after the first time and nothing
> else should be necessary for the continuous stability of the system.
>

Thanks for all the info Diego.

I found this morning on one system that uses ~amd64 portage that
lafilefixer did fix a couple of things so it seems that maybe I needed
it once at least.

QUESTIONS: If I add the function to /etc/portage/bashrc then does it
get updated and removed as I install new versions of portage? Will it
being there cause any problems with later versions of portage that
don't require it?

Cheers,
Mark

Reply via email to