Am 10.11.2010 17:44, schrieb [email protected]:
> I haven't read the entire thread and I don't intend to.  The whole
> concept is so bizarre that I could not read it without thinking of the
> worst most evil bosses and environments I have worked on, and none of
> them even come close.
> 
> It does remind me a bit of what I have read about "computers" back in
> the 1930s, and especially on the atom bomb projects.  There would be a
> project leader who would have to break some formula down into little
> bitty steps which could be famed out to people running calculating
> machines.  There would be a page of steps.  The first few numbers
> would be filled in; each computer (being a human at this time) would
> follow one specific line, say 17 being the sum of 10 and 6, and pass
> the sheet on to someone else.  Presumably hard problems had many
> pages, and someone would copy final numbers from one page to beginning
> numbers on another page.
> 
> Not only did the steps have to be simple, they had to parallelize as
> much as possible, so multiple sheets could start at once, only coming
> together for the final calculations.
> 
> But what really made it fascinating was that for anything secret,
> whether the atom bomb or mere commercial trade secrets, one of the
> goals was to make sure that no one who worked on any single sheet
> could have any idea of the overall project.  You never put units on a
> sheet, never used familiar constants (5280 feet per mile), never ever
> ever let anyone have any idea what they were doing other than
> repeating line 6 + line 10 yields line 17.  I would imagine that if
> you wanted to multiple miles by 5280 to get feet, you could split it
> into two steps on different sheets; one multiplied by 264, the other
> by 20, but probably more obfuscated.
> 


That reminds me of its modern successor: Secure computation [1]

In a nutshell: Do arbitrary computations with data from different
organizations who do not want to share their source data with each
other. They only want to share the final result.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_multi-party_computation

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to