On Tuesday 17 May 2011 23:46:17 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 00:22 on Wednesday 18 May 2011, Mick did > opine > > thusly: > > On Tuesday 17 May 2011 21:32:06 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did > > > > > > opine thusly: > > > > On 17 May 2011 08:01, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I compared by USE to yours and they are much the same apart from ofono > > > (not relevant) and I have ukit enabled. > > > > > > You are running x86 (32 bit) right? > > > > Yes, this is a x86 mostly stable box (except for e17 of course). > > Ha! I believe we found the little fucker causing you grief. > > Very last comment here: > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/759 > (ignore raster's anti-gentoo packager rants) > > Per your initial post, you have: > > [ebuild R ] dev-libs/eeze-1.0.0 USE="nls -doc -static-libs" 0 kB [0] > > I'm certain you forgot to unmask eeze when it first hit the overlay
Yes! That was it! I had unmasked it on the first machine, but not the second. I am confused though, shouldn't it come back and tell me that ezee was required as a dependency and it was masked? Thank you very much! :) PS. You didn't say if icons for USB sticks disappear from your desktop when you unplug them. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
