On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:51:25 Mick wrote: > On Wednesday 18 May 2011 21:31:54 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:34 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did > > opine > > > > thusly: > > > Anyway, tonight it failed right on the first package: > > > ==================================== > > > > > > >>> Emerging (1 of 10) dev-libs/eina-9999 from enlightenment > > > > [snip] > > > > > ../../src/include/eina_binbuf.h:209: note: previous declaration of > > > 'eina_binbuf_length_get' was here > > > eina_amalgamation.c:17936: error: redefinition of '__STRBUF_MAGIC_STR' > > > eina_amalgamation.c:1222: note: previous definition of > > > '__STRBUF_MAGIC_STR' was here > > > > FYI, this is fixed in svn now
I wonder if I can start using the 1.0.0 versions of enlightenment packages yet, or am I supposed to continue using everything from svn and not mix them? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
