Apparently, though unproven, at 22:35 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly:
> > Considering that ~250 devices consumes a teeny-weeny bit of disk space > > and they are hidden from view normally, I say it's worth it leaving them > > in. Which is what vapier also says. > > I see. In my head it is as if we're going against the udev principle of > populating required device nodes. If udev does not start, isn't it time > to head for the nearest LiveCD, or must we ensure that every breakage is > fixable in single-user mode? I don't think we have to go that far. I think we should at least take reasonable steps to ensure the single-user mode works at all. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
