On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:19:40PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: > > Not every tool is for every user or every need. > If there a better tool to use then why bother with something less. > I'm not a thunderbird fanboy so i can accept that t-bird has its > limitations and its problems and that it is not for everyone. >
Thank you for understanding. I don't get the thing of people having a personal stake in what others choose, but it does seem to be pretty common. I appreciate the people who tried to help, and I understand those who cried "PEBKAC" too. But once it's clear I've followed the same directions the same way as others and didn't get the same result, it's time to ask "is this really important enough to pursue further?". Sometimes the answer is "no". In this case, claws-mail looks *much* easier to support. Certainly I see the appeal of tbird though, it's responsive and in every way other than the font sizes (and maybe the addressbook, though I didn't go as deeply into that) it's a pretty impressive piece of work. I just want to deploy something more idiot-proof. And those of you who obviously think *I'm* an idiot, you should meet some of my users! Make me look like the Stephen Hawking of sysadmins... -- klaatu virada nicto
