On 12 August 2005 04:13, Bob Sanders wrote: > On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:40:12 +0100 > > Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am puzzled. First I thought that the Gb NIC on box A is somehow kaput > > but case 1 surely shows it is performing. What the heck is going on here? > > I would be deeply indebted to any person on this list that could shed > > some light on this. Any hint what to investigate would be highly > > appreciated. Really. This has troubled me for the last three days and I > > would go as far as ship you a Windhoek Lager. ;-) > > The long timeout before password is probably DNS not working the port > properly. Just a guess.
Nope. Same behaviour when using IP addresses. > > Have you tried - scp, in both directions? Yes, did it now. Surprisingly it transfers data at 2xB/s both ways. Quite different from sftp. > > And which nfs? V3, V4? I suggest V4, if not. V3 is what nfsstat says. Hmm. I've enabled both, V3 and V4, server- and client-side. How do I force it to use V4? > > Have you run top and netstat -rn on both boxes to see what they think the > routing is? Routes are alright. Both boxes have a route to the class C network (192.168.254.0/24) they are using. Uwe -- 95% of all programmers rate themselves among the top 5% of all software developers. - Linus Torvalds http://www.uwix.iway.na (last updated: 20.06.2004) -- [email protected] mailing list
