Michael Schreckenbauer writes: > Thanks. The difference is, that package.license is per package. > So one could set ACCEPT_LICENSE in make.conf and override this setting > for some packages in package.license. > Now I wonder, what the use-cases would be? > Why would one accept a specific license for package A, but not for > package B?
This probably won't happen. But I like to use the package.license file, so
I can track what were the packages that I accepted licenses for.
Wonko
