On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 23:06:18 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > FWIW, PulseAudio predates Windows Vista, Windows 7, even MacOS X. I > > ran it on a 200MHz machine back when it was called Enlightenment > > Sound Daemon. > > Pulseaudio was meant to be a drop in replacement for ESD but AFAIK > that is where the common grounds end. Pulseaudio was not ESD and ESD > is not Pulseaudio. > > Plus ESD has/had a less than good reputation to say it politely. And that brings us to today's trick question of the day, boys and girls: Which is worse? ESD or aRTS? I swear, with each passing day I become more and more convinced that audio and printing are the two ultimately unsolveable computer science problems. They only seem to ever work at all in a walled garden. -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
