Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer<[email protected]> wrote:
I would. But given the way udev people "solve" those issues, I don't.
If something on /var is needed during boot in the next ten years, they will
propose to move it to /. They do it with /run, they do it with /lock, they
will do it the same way the next time such an issue arises.
You keep speculating and speculating. When you have some evidence to
sustain your claims, we talk.
Regards.
Can you point to where a dev has said that /var, /home or any other
changes will NEVER happen? I would start with the dev that caused all
this if it were me. I would like to hear that from him for sure. Let's
see if you can prove your claim then we'll talk.
Like I said, a year or so ago, I would have thought anyone saying /usr
would need to be on / to boot or a init thingy was losing their mind.
It is just not the way Linux is supposed to be. Yet here we are.
Dale
:-) :-)
