On 2011-10-17, Florian Philipp <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ugh, sorry. Just ignore that. I didn't see the second line in
> config_eth1. The odd quoting confused me.
Sorry about that. I was trying various quoting schemes I'd found in
examples.
My current configuration works:
modules_eth0=( !plug )
config_eth0=( "192.168.8.4/16" )
routes_eth0=( "default via 192.168.0.254" )
modules_eth1=( !plug )
config_eth1=( "10.0.0.1/8" "192.168.250.1/24" )
$ /sbin/ip address show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP
qlen 1000
link/ether 00:1b:21:b1:d1:e9 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.8.4/16 brd 192.168.255.255 scope global eth0
3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP
qlen 1000
link/ether 00:16:17:84:a7:b3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.0.0.1/8 brd 10.255.255.255 scope global eth1
inet 192.168.250.1/24 brd 192.168.250.255 scope global eth1
4: eth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state
UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 00:18:e7:08:20:33 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
And the lack of eth1:1 is presumably explained if the system is using
the iproute2 module instead of the ifconfig module. My current theory
is that iproute2 is getting used because I have openvpn installed with
the iproute2 use flag. [I'm not actually using openvpn, but it's still
istalled from a couple years ago when I was using it.]
Yes, I know that the /24 subnet defined by the second eth1 address
overlaps the /16 subnet defined by the eth0 address.
For historical reasons, 192.168.250.nnn is on eth1, and
192.168.everything-but-250.nnn is on eth0.
And eth2 is used only by a VM client OS.
Yea, it's a messy, but it's still easier than using 4 different
machines....
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I appoint you
at ambassador to Fantasy
gmail.com Island!!!
