Jacques Montier wrote: > Le 18/02/2012 14:51, Dale a écrit : >> Jacques Montier wrote: >>> Le 18/02/2012 13:54, Neil Bothwick a écrit : >>>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote: >>>> >>>>> I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it >>>>> does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. >>>>> I get "instruction not permitted". >>>>> So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. >>>> It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. >>>> >>>> Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you >>>> can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) >>>> >>>> >>> Before ie7, i had an 10 year-old PC, and it was 5 or 6 hours compiling >>> Openoffice... >>> Let's try now...;-) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -- >>> Jacques >>> >> Chew on this one. This is for my old rig: >> >> Thu Dec 22 06:27:17 2011 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1 >> merge time: 18 hours, 46 minutes and 20 seconds. >> >> I just love updating that old thing. lol >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) >> >> > Yes, > > It was worth changing a use flag then :-) > > -- > Jacques >
Funny thing is, I updated that a week or so ago. It took 3 tries to get LOo to compile and finish. Is it just me or do they always seem to fail right at the end? ROLF Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
