On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Am Sonntag, 17. Juni 2012, 11:52:48 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: >> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info> wrote: >> > So, while we're meta-discussing Linus' rant on Gnome3, here's an article >> > from TechRadar exploring the usability of the leading Linux desktop >> > environments. >> > >> > http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/whats-the-best-li >> > nux-desktop-environment-1045280 >> > >> > Summary: Try the latest KDE. You might get pleasantly surprised. >> >> In my humble opinion, you should use whatever you actually like. You >> don't like GNOME? Then don't use it; and if you used it before and >> don't like the new version, either get involver to get it "fixed" (for >> whatever defintion of "fixed" you want), fork it (although maybe you >> should first try Unity, MATE, or Cinnamon before), or go to another >> desktop. >> >> I like GNOME 3, therefore I use it. I like systemd, therefore I use >> it. I like Emacs, therefore I use it. If someone else wants to use >> KDE, OpenRC, and Vim, it's none of my business. To each his own. > > one question - how can you call something that doesn't even let you change the > fonts call a 'desktop environment'? > > -- > #163933 >
Ignoring the fact that I *can* change the font, why should I have to? It's fine as it is for me ;).
