Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > The 07/09/12, Dale wrote: > >> The thing is tho, whether it is using the memory as cache or using it >> as >> tmpfs, it is the same memory. There is no difference. That's the >> whole >> point. > Feel free to take your own assumptions as undeniable truth. The way the > kernel work with memory is the key, of course. > > Now, as long as you blind yourself with statements like that, I'm not > going to respond anymore. I guess you need to make some basic research. >
I understand how the kernel uses memory. That's why it doesn't matter if you put portage's work directory on tmpfs or not. I been using Linux for a pretty good long while now. I have a pretty good understanding of it, especially the things that I use. Respond or not, I know what I tested and what the results were. They were not just my tests and results either. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
