Hi all,
I thought I'd posted about this way back when I opened the bug at
sourceforge:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3494798&group_id=80013&atid=558446
but didn't find anything in my local archives, so I guess I didn't...
Does anyone use clucene? I'm planning on enabling FTS (full text search)
on a new dovecot server, and was planning on using clucene, but would
like to see about getting this warning taken care of (if it is indedd
something I need to be worried about)...
I only got one response on the bug tracker (a month after my original
report, and that only after I pinged for a reply) saying they weren't
doing much work on it at the moment and that they'd look into it in a
few days, then nothing - and that was back in March.
Here is the warning:
QA Notice: Package triggers severe warnings which indicate that it
may exhibit random runtime failures.
/var/tmp/portage/dev-cpp/clucene-2.3.3.4-r4/work/clucene-core-2.3.3.4/src/core/CLucene/index/DocumentsWriter.cpp:129:33:
warning: passing NULL to non-pointer argument 2 of ‘void* memset(void*,
int, size_t)’
Please do not file a Gentoo bug and instead report the above QA
issues directly to the upstream developers of this software.
Homepage:http://clucene.sourceforge.net/
I'm assuming everyone gets this warning, so am wondering what it means,
and whether or not I should even bother with clucene. Lucene++ appears
to possibly be the new lucene implementation, but it is <yuck> java based...
