On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:17:17 -0500 Tanstaafl <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2012-11-20 12:05 PM, Bruce Hill <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:46:59AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> Anyone? > >> > >> I don't see any news blurbs warning about it, but with everything > >> going on with udev, systemd, etc, I'm not risking updating > >> unless/until I know it is safe. > > > Have you read the requirements in > > /usr/portage/sys-apps/openrc/openrc-0.11.5.ebuild ? > > I don't see anything in there labeled 'requirements'... > > All I found was: > > RDEPEND="virtual/init > kernel_FreeBSD? ( || ( >=sys-freebsd/freebsd-ubin-9.0_rc > sys-process/fuser-bsd ) ) > elibc_glibc? ( >=sys-libs/glibc-2.5 ) > ncurses? ( sys-libs/ncurses ) > pam? ( sys-auth/pambase ) > >=sys-apps/baselayout-2.1-r1 > kernel_linux? ( > sys-process/psmisc > ) > !<sys-fs/udev-133" > > So, *maybe* the last line means it needs a udev not less than 133 - > but I don't know enough about how ebuilds to work to risk an > unbootable system if it doesn't mean what I think it means. > > Sorry, I'm not a programmer and don't know what to look for (or even > where to look until you pointed me to the file), so how about just a > simple answer? He probably means all the elogs and ewarns in there - that ebuild is littered with the things. View the ebuild in less and search on "equire", you'll see what I mean. "!<sys-fs/udev-133" does indeed mean the ebuild requires udev that is not less than 133. or put another way, it wants udev version 133 or higher. -- Alan McKinnon [email protected]
